Jim Parent - City Commissioner, St Pete Beach » Looking out for the interest of the Community.©

“I like to listen. I have learned a great deal from listening carefully. Most people never listen.“ - Ernest Hemingway

HOME PAGE

SPB Legal Expenses

Gulfport Red light cams

11/11 Settlement Offers

2012 Budget Items

Legal $$$ ???

So I'm reading ........

Q2 Community Dev Report

SPB Comp Plan

Character Districts

Times gets it wrong again

Upham Beach Update

Boats in your backyard!

Pinellas Road Safety

SPB Rec Center 2011

Misc. SPB Stuff

2012 Pre-budget meeting

Egan Park Value

FDOT Plans

St Pete Beach Crime Data

Hurricane Prep Loans

SPB Infrastructure

Stormwater

1965 X-14 SPB

Comp Plan Facts

Comp Plan Q&A

SUNSTAR

SPB Newsletters

USEFUL LINKS

Meet Jim

Resident Appointments

Contact Information

The Graveyard

Your wasted Tax Dollars

Weiss letter

Proof!!

SPB Election Results

2012 Pre-budget workshop

Recount results

Pinellas Cnty Budget Mtg

Obsolete bits and bobs

Energy Bill Help

Today's FBI

Why have Runoffs?

Debunk Summary

Comp Plan Voting Movie

Public Records Request

Vent

SECRET GOVERNMENT?

Harry's Task

Pinellas May/June Events

Extra Legal Expenses

Where do I live?

Shade Meeting Transcripts

Election Propaganda

Ballot Issue 4

Election Finance Records

Election Polling Places

PRESS RELEASE

More from Ken Weiss

Another records request

Campaign $$ Reports

Newest lawsuit

Petitions

Mayoral Runoff Election

March election info

March 2011 Ballot Issues

April Campaign Funds

Appendix B

Deesen's defence

2008/09 Perspective

Comp Plan

Infrasturcture/Budget

NOV. STATE AMENDMENT 4

Some Ken Weiss emails

2012 Budget Workshop

Almost budget time!!!

I love this idea

CENSUS INFO

Pinellas MPO 2035 Plan

Issues

Results

Overview

SPB Legal Defense Costs

City's final offer

Appendix A

Appendix D

Egan Park

SPB Litigation spending

My Budget thoughts

Bay Way Bridge

Appendix C

Legislative Status

Residential Rentals !!!!

Welcome all new visitors!
New updates as of 29 December
 2011

Newest at the top.

I just posted up to date information (as of close of the fiscal year) on St Pete Beach litigation expenses going back to 2004. 

Click ->HERE<- to view the document.

It is always my goal to provide as much information as I can to the residents of St Pete Beach.

Here is the agenda for the recent FDOT preconstruction meeting that was part of the planning for a smooth reconstruction project to replace Structure C of the Pinellas Bayway. 

Click <HERE> to read the agenda.

Currently, as you can see, construction is scheduled to begin on 6 Feb., 2012.

A public workshop will scheduled for shortly after the first of the year.  I will pass along more details as I get them.

Merry Christmas

Jim Parent

.

Visit Florida, the state's Tourism Marketing Organization, released data describing the tourism activity for the 3rd quarter of 2011.

The numbers are encouraging.  You can read more about it >HERE<.

You, the City, received an offer from Mr. Kadoura to settle some of the pending lawsuits.

I have put his offer and your City's counter-offer here on my website so you can read it.

I think your City Commission proposed, via public meeting motion, an excellent counter-offer.  One that was intended to accommodate ALL the lawsuits against our Comp Plan and not just 60% of them.  I think we did a good job covering everything they have represented that they want and I think our proposal is a good attempt to minimize taxpayer litigation expenses.

Read it >HERE< and see what you think.


Did you know that Ken Weiss has filed at least 76 motions that have required responsive pleadings by our City Legal Team; paid for by your tax dollars?

I attended one of them today that was held in the Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Court of the State of Florida in and for Pinellas County.  I sat at the defense table with our City legal team.

This particular suit was brought by Jim Anderson, the Plaintiff.  He did not bother to attend.

I could go thought my notes and give you my opinion of the session but I am going to save that for a later date.

The topic at hand is a Settlement offer from Bruce Kadoura.  Since I started talking one-on-one with Bruce your City has managed to agree to dismissal of three lawsuits.

This offer is for a fourth.

In the first three the agreement was that opposing parities would just walk away and handle their own costs.

This offer is different.  The Plaintiff wants the City (you, the Taxpayers) to pay them $20,000 to walk away.

And, as you can see by an email chain I have attached, Weiss et al, do not want to account for what could possibly make up that $20,000.  We estimate thier legitimate costs to be about one tenth (10%) of that. 

Recently we have been approached by a resident (with a petition of around 100 signatures) who wants us to scrutinize our legal fees.  I have done that and I am confident we are getting great value for our money.  I think, in the spirit of scrutiny, that to consider this demand for money, we must get an accounting of expenses and not accept some number pulled out of who knows where.

I'm not sure that is a settlement.  To me, a settlement usually occurs when there is a debt owed of some sort and the parties agree to some alternate amount of payment or terms of payment.  I don't see a debt owed here so perhaps there is some other concept about what is going on.

I had thought all of this was about the Comp Plan and/or Sunshine law not money.

At any rate, one of the things that Ken said in today’s hearing was that we, the commission, do not bring things before the residents.  While our legal team pointed to the 139 public hearings that have been held in connection with Comp Plan/Land Use, I am taking his suggestion and putting this most recent settlement(?) demand here on my website for you to read.

IF, we agree to this payoff, it will be our (Taxpayer) money.  So read the materials.  I know the commission has/will.  Tell us what you think. 

Make that payment?  Don’t pay them off?  Your opinion matters.

HERE is the email chain proposing the payoff with Weiss threatening to bump the demand up to $25,000, still with no accounting (see Weber’s 20 Oct email; third one down).

HERE is the Settlement proposal and litigation status.  Read it carefully.

HERE is the SOLV (SOLV is a co-defendant in this case) position on the settlement offer.

HERE is the pending motions status update.

Read it all.  What do YOU think we should do?

You can email your opinion to any of and/or all commissioners.  My email address is j.parent@stpetebeach.org and you can find the emails for the rest of us at the City website or rest assured I will copy the whole commission on anything you send to me.

This is your City.  This is your money.

I take my position as your representative City Trustee very seriously and your input can help shape my vote on the commission.

 


Want to know a bit more about the Corey Avenue beautification idea?

I have uploaded a CONCEPTUAL layout of what might be done to make Corey Avenue a more pedestrian friendly, walk around, hang around place.

As I see more I will post more.

You can view this first CONCEPT >here<




St. Pete Beach Attains Green Government Certification

>Read about it here<

There have been several messages by several people about the results of a recent motion in one the City's lawsuits.  The theme of these messages are roughly that of the "Cost to the taxpayers AGAIN for ANOTHER losing motion" and "the City and their attorneys lost the motion to dismiss".

I thought you might want to decide that veracity of those lines of reasoning for yourselves.

Contrary to (mis-?)representations made over the weekend, the court did NOT deny the City's Motion to Dismiss.  In fact, the Court directs Pyle to file his Answer Brief within 20 days and states that a ruling on the merits of the Motion to Dismiss will be made after the briefing schedule is concluded.  Finally Pyle will have to incur some expense and actually file an Answer brief.  Note that this is contrary to Weiss and Weber's (the lawyers suing your City) contention that their time to file their Answer brief is tolled (delayed) until the Court dispenses with their Motion for Sanctions.

Here is the actual order issued by the 2nd DCA on September 30, 2011 in the Pyle appeal.  


Document
Click here to read the one page court order


A bit over a week ago I posted Jim Anderson’s expanded lawsuit against our City (22 pages to 33 pages, see the article below this one to read it). 

This time I am posting our City’s response to that lawsuit.

Don’t read legalizee?      No problem.      You will get the sense of our response to the Court relevant to the latest burden attributable to Mr. Anderson and his Lawyer Ken Weiss.

Read our arguements <here>.
------------------------------


I thought the lawsuits against our City had slowed down a bit.  We reflected that in our proposed budget for the upcoming year.  Now I see evidence that makes me want to reconsider.

Jim Anderson, one of the very people who spoke at your last commission meeting has EXPANDED his suit against you. 

It is 50% longer (33 pages versus 22 pages) than the original complaint.  Somebody asked me if Ken Weiss has found a new milk source.  While I don't about that, I am wondering if we need to increase our litigation budget forecast because of this.  Let me know what you think by sending me your opinion at J.Parent@StPeteBeach.org

I have put all 33 pages of the new amended lawsuit <HERE> foryou to read. 

Be part of the solution.

If you are interested in serving the City either as a Board or Committee member, a poll worker or a volunteer, please fill out THIS form and fax, email, mail, or take it to City Hall or one of the City Commissioners.


We are working toward finalizing our 2012 Budget for St Pete Beach.  

The initial preliminary budget, as drawn up by the City Manager and Staff, was balanced and used the same millage rate as last year.  That budget represented a decrease in revenues (and hence City activity) of over $335,000.

The Budget and Finance Committee held several public meetings on that preliminary budget, spoke with each and every department in the City, received input from the public and gave their recommendation to the City Commission for further consideration.

Subsequently, the Commission held two public workshops to consider those recommendations and also to solicit input and discuss the budget.

The result is a balanced budget with some activities added back in.

There will be two more public hearings on the finalization of the budget and setting of the millage rate by the end of September.

Click HERE to see the Commission changes to the original preliminary budget.

So I'm reading the comments about Ms. Estrada's article in the Times on Sunday 31 July titled "St. Pete Beach lawyers move to end appeals of comprehensive plan ruling" and I thought "Whaaaat?"


>>>UPDATED<<< with all the names on the petitions.

The City received a request for "an impartial audit of the legal expenses incurred by Mr. Michael Davis and his Law partners: Bryant Miller Olive PA as a result of lawsuits brought against the city".  The request is accompanied by petition signatures from, I think, 117* people;  about 1.2% of our residents.  You can read my observations about this "request" and the actual petition itself

 
HERE.

In the right hand column.


*I counted (three times) 109 names. 


Do you wonder what causes much of the legal expense the City incurs?  It seems to me that most people understand what drives our expenditures.  Some don't.  Click here for some numbers associated with the problem.


New! Community Development Quarterly Report posted. 
Code Enforcement, Permits, Inspections, Plan reviews.

The St Pete Times Gets it Wrong Again.
Perhaps they should verify their sources.
Read about it here.

To see the St Pete Beach 2012 tentative budget
Click these words.


I just posted the maps to our Comprehensive Plan describing the 11 Character Districts.  You can find them in the menu on the left, near the top, under "SPB Comp Plan" and then the "Character District" pop-out menu.
Yes, even more lawsuit expenses looming for St Pete Beach TAXPAYERS.

Here is the Ken Weiss email and the attachment he provided that tells all about it and where he went outside the City and the State of Florida to find somebody, anybody that might continue to pay him to cost the St Pete Beach taxpayers even more money.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kenneth Weiss [mailto:kweiss1@tampabay.rr.com] 
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 6:29 PM
To: Kenneth Weiss
Subject: Press release- Citizens Get Knight Grant to Set Aside March
Referendum in St. Pete Beach...comp plan in doubt

This was just released. Feel free to forward. Article in Wed Neighborhood
Times.

Click HERE to read the press release that will be in the St Pete Times on Wednesday.  This is what is known as a slow scoop at the Times.


Click this text to read yet another Shade Meeting Transcript released by the City.  This one is part of the Anderson v St Pete Beach suit, the June 28, 2011 transcript. 
Almost real-time.
 




Frustrated by the bazillion dollars that the City is being forced to spend to defend the community against lawsuits?  I am.  I get periodic updates as to the progress of our legal actions.  Since it's our tax dollars we should all get the updates.  Here is the latest one.


 As a City Commissioner it's part of the job, and a lot of work, to keep up with the latest Florida Laws.  Did you know that now you can legally coast downhill in neutral?  Or even with the clutch in?  No more $60 fine.  See some of the laws I have been continuously tracking and am trying to learn to understand what, if any, impact they could have on us.



And another Shade meeting (28 April) transcript released.  This one is yet again one that Mr. Anderson has sued the City to see, trying to force the spending of your tax dollars, to see. So, as has been done previously, we have released it voluntarily.  Please note that it would have been made public as a normal part of procedure when the legal actions discussed were complete but it seems that Mr. Anderson and Ken Weiss can't wait for that so we released it.  You can read it HERE. 


Click HERE to read yet another Shade meeting transcript that we just voluntarily released early and sent to Ken Weiss

and

Click HERE to read a letter from Ken giving us his opinion as to why he thinks we don't have a Comp Plan and that our lawyers are bad guys.  I happen to think they are earning their money dealing with exactly these types of things and the numerous lawsuits Ken has filed against us. 

Did you read the St Pete Times article on the upcoming budget process?  Newspaper writers; their job is to sell newspapers.  We have had the proposed budget up on the city website since the 24th of June.  I doubt if all the commissioners have read it through yet.  Let alone the Budget and Finance committee.  Want the objective truth?  Read it.  Give us (the Commission or the Budget and Finance Committee members, your input.  Click on these words to go to the online version and start reading.


Upham Beach t-Head Groin Repair Project Status

2011 SPB Recreation Center Calendar and FAQ.

Got people anchored in your backyard?
Read the latest from our Police Department.

Egan Park Acquisition Appraisal.

See a mistake?  Disagree with an opinion?
Let Me Know.  Click HERE


If you would like to visit the official St Pete Beach City website CLICK our LOGO 

Sunset Capital of Florida
Counter
Jim Parent
Jim Parent
Commissioner,
District 2, 
St Pete Beach

CLICK the calendar for this month's City meeting schedule

St Pete Beach City Meetings
Calendar, Agendas, Archived Videos
“Information is the currency of democracy.”

~ Jefferson


You can read the City of St Pete Beach eNewsletters >here<.

2009, 2010, 2011 Jim Parent ©